GC=F vs. MCHI
GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset, while MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GC=F vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCHI
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -6.89%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -10.41%
- 1Y
- -0.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- -6.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
GC=F vs. MCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.84% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -9.61% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -19.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC=F and MCHI is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC=F vs. MCHI — Risk / Return Rank
GC=F
MCHI
GC=F vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GC=F | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.09 | — |
Drawdowns
GC=F vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC=F | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -62.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -38.36% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -24.53% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.59% | — |
Volatility
GC=F vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC=F | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 20.23% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 30.73% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 27.40% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC=F and MCHI have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GC=F and MCHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer