ETCO vs. GSOL
ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) and GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETCO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSOL.
Performance
ETCO vs. GSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETCO
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -20.32%
- YTD
- -33.38%
- 6M
- -34.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSOL
- 1D
- -4.43%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCO vs. GSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | -10.02% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCO and GSOL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCO vs. GSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETCO | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.16 | -2.23 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
ETCO vs. GSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, which is greater than GSOL's maximum drawdown of -12.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and GSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCO | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.81% | -12.36% | -44.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.32% | -12.36% | -41.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.43% | -5.53% | -28.90% |
Volatility
ETCO vs. GSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCO | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.49% | 51.66% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.49% | 51.66% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.49% | 51.66% | +0.83% |
ETCO vs. GSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GSOL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCO vs. GSOL - Dividend Comparison
ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.41%, while GSOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | 127.41% | 42.29% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCO and GSOL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ETCO.
ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 127.41%, compared with 0.00% for GSOL.
Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 0.35% for GSOL.
Find the right allocation for ETCO and GSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer