ETCO vs. GLNK

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) and GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. ETCO is actively managed, while GLNK is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETCO charges 0.66%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for GLNK.

Performance

ETCO vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ETCO having a -36.71% return and GLNK slightly higher at -35.65%.

ETCO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.67%
• 6M: -38.73%
• YTD: -36.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLNK

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: -39.72%
• YTD: -35.65%
• 1Y: -77.14%
• 3Y*: -22.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETCO vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF	-36.71%	-26.08%
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	-35.65%	-77.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCO and GLNK is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

ETCO vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETCO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLNK

GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 3
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETCO vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETCO	GLNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.85	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.06	—

Drawdowns

ETCO vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -59.43%, smaller than the maximum GLNK drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and GLNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETCO	GLNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.43%	-96.25%	+36.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-89.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-96.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.60%	-95.86%	+39.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.06%	-56.67%	+19.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	72.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETCO	GLNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.80%	104.13%	-52.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.80%	163.00%	-111.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.80%	163.00%	-111.20%

ETCO vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GLNK's 2.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETCO vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison

ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 146.28%, while GLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF	146.28%	42.29%
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETCO and GLNK in my portfolio?

ETCO and GLNK have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETCO or GLNK?

On fees, ETCO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETCO or GLNK?

ETCO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETCO or GLNK?

ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 146.28%, compared with 0.00% for GLNK.

What is the main difference between ETCO and GLNK?

Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 2.50% for GLNK.