ETCO vs. GLNK
ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) and GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. ETCO is actively managed, while GLNK is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETCO charges 0.66%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for GLNK.
Performance
ETCO vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETCO having a -29.56% return and GLNK slightly lower at -30.61%.
ETCO
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -29.56%
- 6M
- -27.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLNK
- 1D
- -6.09%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- -30.61%
- 6M
- -36.42%
- 1Y
- -53.39%
- 3Y*
- -9.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCO vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | -29.56% | -24.78% |
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF | -30.61% | -77.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCO and GLNK is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCO vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank
ETCO
GLNK
ETCO vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETCO | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.11 | -0.01 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
ETCO vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, smaller than the maximum GLNK drawdown of -95.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and GLNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCO | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.81% | -95.82% | +39.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -88.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -95.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.70% | -95.54% | +43.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -55.66% | +21.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 66.45% | — |
Volatility
ETCO vs. GLNK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCO | GLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 51.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.29% | 110.12% | -57.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.29% | 164.94% | -112.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.29% | 164.94% | -112.65% |
ETCO vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GLNK's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCO vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison
ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 120.50%, while GLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | 120.50% | 42.29% |
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCO and GLNK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETCO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETCO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.
ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 120.50%, compared with 0.00% for GLNK.
Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 2.50% for GLNK.
Find the right allocation for ETCO and GLNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer