PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETCO vs. ETCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETCO vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCO achieves a -29.56% return, which is significantly higher than ETCG's -36.13% return.


ETCO

1D
-4.36%
1M
-14.31%
YTD
-29.56%
6M
-27.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETCG

1D
-2.07%
1M
-6.49%
YTD
-36.13%
6M
-44.17%
1Y
-51.71%
3Y*
-10.97%
5Y*
-36.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETCO vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ETCO
Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF
-29.56%-24.78%
ETCG
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)
-36.13%-41.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCO and ETCG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETCO vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETCO

ETCG
ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETCO vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ETCO vs. ETCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETCOETCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.11

-0.18

-0.92

Drawdowns

ETCO vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and ETCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETCOETCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.81%

-96.59%

+39.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.70%

-95.38%

+43.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.33%

-82.66%

+48.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.21%

Volatility

ETCO vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETCOETCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.29%

62.04%

-9.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.29%

94.04%

-41.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.29%

115.36%

-63.07%

ETCO vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETCO vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison

ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 120.50%, while ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ETCO and ETCG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETCO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETCO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 120.50%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.

Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 2.50% for ETCG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETCO and ETCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer