ETCG vs. GSOL
ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. ETCG is passively managed, while GSOL is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSOL.
Performance
ETCG vs. GSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETCG
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- -39.56%
- 6M
- -43.02%
- 1Y
- -52.25%
- 3Y*
- -16.15%
- 5Y*
- -32.95%
- 10Y*
- —
GSOL
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCG vs. GSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -9.68% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -14.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCG and GSOL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCG vs. GSOL — Risk / Return Rank
ETCG
GSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETCG vs. GSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETCG | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETCG vs. GSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than GSOL's maximum drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and GSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCG | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.59% | -22.60% | -73.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.63% | -15.93% | -79.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.71% | -12.89% | -69.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.02% | — | — |
Volatility
ETCG vs. GSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCG | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.07% | 83.47% | -21.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.49% | 83.47% | +10.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.00% | 83.47% | +31.53% |
ETCG vs. GSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSOL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCG vs. GSOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETCG nor GSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCG and GSOL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
ETCG and GSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.35% for GSOL.
Find the right allocation for ETCG and GSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer