ETCG vs. GSOL
ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. ETCG is passively managed, while GSOL is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSOL.
Performance
ETCG vs. GSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETCG
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -35.40%
- 6M
- -44.65%
- 1Y
- -51.42%
- 3Y*
- -10.63%
- 5Y*
- -35.81%
- 10Y*
- —
GSOL
- 1D
- -4.43%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCG vs. GSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -1.87% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCG and GSOL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCG vs. GSOL — Risk / Return Rank
ETCG
GSOL
ETCG vs. GSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETCG | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETCG | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | -2.23 | +2.05 |
Drawdowns
ETCG vs. GSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than GSOL's maximum drawdown of -12.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and GSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCG | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.59% | -12.36% | -84.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.33% | -12.36% | -82.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.67% | -5.53% | -77.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.41% | — | — |
Volatility
ETCG vs. GSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCG | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.03% | 51.66% | +10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.03% | 51.66% | +42.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.33% | 51.66% | +63.67% |
ETCG vs. GSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSOL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCG vs. GSOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETCG nor GSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCG and GSOL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
ETCG and GSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.35% for GSOL.
Find the right allocation for ETCG and GSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer