PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETCG vs. ETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETCG vs. ETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -48.20% return, which is significantly lower than ETH's -36.56% return.


ETCG

1D
-1.86%
1M
-14.29%
6M
-35.63%
YTD
-48.20%
1Y
-66.90%
3Y*
-21.33%
5Y*
-37.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-22.21%

ETH

1D
-2.84%
1M
10.01%
6M
-29.59%
YTD
-36.56%
1Y
-46.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$71.03K$57.65K$119.33K
$31.73M$33.86M$46.60M

ETCG vs. ETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETCG
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)
-48.20%-39.78%-3.98%
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF
-36.56%-10.89%-4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCG and ETH is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.69

The correlation between ETCG and ETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETCG vs. ETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETCG
ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ETH
ETH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETCG vs. ETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETCGETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.89

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.73

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

-1.10

-0.24

ETCG vs. ETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETCG Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the ETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETCG and ETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETCG vs. ETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than ETH's maximum drawdown of -67.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and ETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETCGETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.59%

-67.52%

-29.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.70%

-67.52%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.25%

-60.93%

-35.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.88%

-35.04%

-47.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.07%

45.07%

+6.00%

Volatility

ETCG vs. ETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) is 9.78%, while Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH) has a volatility of 13.08%. This indicates that ETCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETCGETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

13.08%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.46%

45.84%

-12.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.33%

67.17%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.73%

71.22%

+19.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.32%

71.22%

+43.10%

ETCG vs. ETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ETH's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETCG vs. ETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETCG nor ETH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETCG and ETH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETH has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to ETCG (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs ETH's -67.52%.

On 1-year performance, ETH leads with -46.03% vs -66.90% for ETCG. On fees, ETH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ETCG has been the lower-risk option at 9.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ETH has performed better with a -46.03% return vs -66.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

ETCG and ETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.15% for ETH.

ETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETCG and ETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer