ETCG vs. MNRS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETCG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Ethereum Classic (ETC), while MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETCG returned -66.78% vs 38.67% for MNRS. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.

Performance

ETCG vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -47.46% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 20.57% return.

ETCG

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -13.06%
• 6M: -34.35%
• YTD: -47.46%
• 1Y: -66.78%
• 3Y*: -20.02%
• 5Y*: -37.77%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -22.05%

MNRS

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -1.83%
• 6M: 5.31%
• YTD: 20.57%
• 1Y: 38.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	$62.63K	$57.03K	$104.25K
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	$334.32K	$247.38K	$543.60K

ETCG vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	-47.46%	-45.50%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	20.57%	14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCG and MNRS is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

ETCG vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETCG

ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 1
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 0
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 23
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETCG vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETCG	MNRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	0.51	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.32	1.22	-3.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.14	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	0.69	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	1.25	-2.55

ETCG vs. MNRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETCG Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the MNRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETCG and MNRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETCG vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than MNRS's maximum drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and MNRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETCG	MNRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.59%	-56.70%	-39.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.70%	-56.70%	-16.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.20%	-33.54%	-62.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.89%	-23.97%	-58.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.47%	30.98%	+20.49%

Volatility

ETCG vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) is 9.74%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) has a volatility of 28.62%. This indicates that ETCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETCG	MNRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	28.62%	-18.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.37%	56.69%	-23.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.25%	75.70%	-18.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.69%	72.67%	+18.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.27%	72.67%	+41.60%

ETCG vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETCG vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

Position	TTM	2025
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	0.00%	0.00%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.45%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETCG and MNRS in my portfolio?

ETCG and MNRS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETCG or MNRS?

MNRS has higher volatility (28.62%) compared to ETCG (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs MNRS's -56.70%.

Which ETF is better, ETCG or MNRS?

On 1-year performance, MNRS leads with 38.67% vs -66.78% for ETCG. On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ETCG has been the lower-risk option at 9.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETCG or MNRS?

Over the 1-year period, MNRS has performed better with a 38.67% return vs -66.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETCG or MNRS?

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETCG or MNRS?

MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.

What is the main difference between ETCG and MNRS?

ETCG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNRS is Blockchain. ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC), while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.59% for MNRS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.