GAPIX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
GAPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
GAPIX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAPIX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund | -5.10% | 21.72% | 24.35% | 20.67% | -18.97% | 20.53% | 13.61% | 31.78% | -11.06% | 26.49% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAPIX achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPIX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
GAPIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -9.63%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -1.88%
- 1Y
- 17.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAPIX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAPIX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
GAPIX
FGIAX
GAPIX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAPIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.75 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 2.26 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.61 | -1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 12.12 | -6.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAPIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.75 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.80 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.58 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.42 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAPIX and FGIAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAPIX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
GAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.26%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund | 15.26% | 14.49% | 14.79% | 5.27% | 6.66% | 12.60% | 2.64% | 10.09% | 2.88% | 2.33% | 1.56% | 1.39% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
GAPIX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAPIX drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPIX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAPIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.36% | -49.35% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.26% | -8.29% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.13% | -21.08% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -38.02% | +1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | -3.78% | -6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -7.22% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 1.78% | +1.10% |
Volatility
GAPIX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that GAPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAPIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 4.05% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 7.09% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 12.28% | +5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 13.08% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 15.17% | +2.79% |