GAPIX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GAPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GAPIX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAPIX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund | -5.10% | 21.72% | 24.35% | 20.67% | -18.97% | 20.53% | 13.61% | 31.78% | -11.06% | 26.49% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAPIX achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GAPIX has outperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.
GAPIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -9.63%
- YTD
- -5.10%
- 6M
- -1.88%
- 1Y
- 17.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAPIX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAPIX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GAPIX
GSIFX
GAPIX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAPIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.60 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 0.91 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.12 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 0.81 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 3.23 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAPIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.60 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.32 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.48 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.30 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAPIX and GSIFX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GAPIX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.26%, more than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund | 15.26% | 14.49% | 14.79% | 5.27% | 6.66% | 12.60% | 2.64% | 10.09% | 2.88% | 2.33% | 1.56% | 1.39% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GAPIX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAPIX drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, roughly equal to the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAPIX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAPIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.36% | -59.25% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.26% | -12.15% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.13% | -31.94% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -35.00% | -1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | -11.48% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -15.30% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.06% | -0.18% |
Volatility
GAPIX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) is 5.44%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that GAPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAPIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 6.71% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 11.13% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 16.87% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 16.71% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 17.32% | +0.64% |