GAMR vs. ODDS
GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and ODDS (Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while ODDS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GAMR returned 16.12%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for ODDS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAMR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ODDS.
Performance
GAMR vs. ODDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly higher than ODDS's -16.40% return.
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 13.55%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
ODDS
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- -16.40%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- -13.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAMR vs. ODDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.68% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -24.16% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | -16.40% | 16.71% | 27.61% | 25.03% | -14.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAMR and ODDS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between GAMR and ODDS shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GAMR vs. ODDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GAMR
ODDS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
GAMR
ODDS
Communication Services
GAMR
ODDS
Consumer Cyclical
GAMR
ODDS
Financial Services
GAMR
ODDS
-
Basic Materials
GAMR
-
ODDS
-
Consumer Defensive
GAMR
-
ODDS
-
Energy
GAMR
-
ODDS
-
Healthcare
GAMR
-
ODDS
-
Industrials
GAMR
-
ODDS
-
Real Estate
GAMR
-
ODDS
-
Utilities
GAMR
-
ODDS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAMR vs. ODDS — Risk / Return Rank
GAMR
ODDS
GAMR vs. ODDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAMR | ODDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | -0.68 | +1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | -0.82 | +2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.90 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | -0.39 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.55 | -0.69 | +2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAMR | ODDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | -0.68 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.28 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
GAMR vs. ODDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than ODDS's maximum drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and ODDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAMR | ODDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -35.09% | -20.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.36% | -35.09% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | -35.09% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.61% | -30.27% | +16.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -9.16% | -12.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.82% | 19.81% | -6.99% |
Volatility
GAMR vs. ODDS - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) at 4.69%. This indicates that GAMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ODDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAMR | ODDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 4.69% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 15.74% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.32% | 20.36% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 24.87% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 24.87% | -0.60% |
GAMR vs. ODDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ODDS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAMR vs. ODDS - Dividend Comparison
GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than ODDS's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ODDS Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF | 2.91% | 2.59% | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAMR and ODDS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAMR has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to ODDS (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs ODDS's -35.09%.
On 3-year performance, GAMR leads with 16.12% vs 7.66% for ODDS. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ODDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for ODDS.
ODDS has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.50% for GAMR.
GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while ODDS is Technology Equities. GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while ODDS tracks BlueStar Global Online Gambling, Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.63% for ODDS.
GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAMR and ODDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer