GAMR vs. BLOK

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify. GAMR is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAMR returned 0.42%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for BLOK. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAMR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BLOK.

Performance

GAMR vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 4.97% return.

GAMR

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 3.55%
• 6M: 3.73%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 1Y: 8.97%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 0.42%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

BLOK

• 1D: -3.74%
• 1M: -9.78%
• 6M: -7.07%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 1Y: -0.31%
• 3Y*: 35.04%
• 5Y*: 12.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAMR vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	2.63%	39.20%	11.23%	6.89%	-36.96%	11.31%	76.83%	14.76%	-21.90%
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	4.97%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-62.36%	30.76%	90.17%	29.54%	-25.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GAMR and BLOK is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018	0.67

The correlation between GAMR and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

GAMR vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GAMR	BLOK
Technology	66.8%	32.8%
Communication Services	19.1%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	6.5%
Financial Services	0.3%	56.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.6%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GAMR vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAMR

GAMR Risk / Return Rank: 15
GAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
GAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
GAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 16
GAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
GAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 13

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 10
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAMR vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAMR	BLOK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	-0.01	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	0.26	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.03	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	-0.01	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.67	-0.02	+0.69

GAMR vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAMR and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GAMR vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and BLOK.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAMR	BLOK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-73.33%	+17.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.36%	-35.64%	+6.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.36%	-35.64%	+6.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.57%	-73.33%	+22.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.49%	-18.85%	+4.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.06%	-25.91%	+3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.38%	16.93%	-3.55%

Volatility

GAMR vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is 6.38%, while Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that GAMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAMR	BLOK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	8.37%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.05%	29.55%	-10.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.49%	38.97%	-15.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.63%	42.53%	-17.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.35%	38.98%	-14.63%

GAMR vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAMR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAMR vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than BLOK's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.82%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	0.51%	0.52%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAMR and BLOK in my portfolio?

GAMR and BLOK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAMR or BLOK?

BLOK has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to GAMR (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

Which ETF is better, GAMR or BLOK?

On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 12.01% vs 0.42% for GAMR. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 6.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAMR or BLOK?

Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAMR or BLOK?

GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAMR or BLOK?

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.51% for GAMR.

What is the main difference between GAMR and BLOK?

GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while BLOK is Blockchain. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GAMR and 0.70% for BLOK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.