GAMR vs. BATT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, while BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. GAMR is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAMR returned 1.75%/yr vs -2.30%/yr for BATT. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

GAMR vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAMR achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than BATT's 4.71% return.

GAMR

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 4.61%
• 6M: 9.99%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 1Y: 8.65%
• 3Y*: 17.09%
• 5Y*: 1.75%
• 10Y*: 12.37%
• ALL TIME*: 13.64%

BATT

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -4.49%
• 6M: -4.11%
• YTD: 4.71%
• 1Y: 50.64%
• 3Y*: 5.35%
• 5Y*: -2.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	$636.05K	$767.46K	$1.35M
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	$71.68K	$73.79K	$110.84K

GAMR vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	5.19%	39.20%	11.23%	6.89%	-36.96%	11.31%	76.83%	14.76%	-28.31%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	4.71%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	16.52%	44.43%	-2.40%	-42.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GAMR and BATT is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018	0.65

The correlation between GAMR and BATT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

GAMR vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GAMR	BATT
Technology	66.2%	3.1%
Communication Services	19.6%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	20.6%
Financial Services	0.6%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	57.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	17.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GAMR vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GAMR

GAMR Risk / Return Rank: 18
GAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
GAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 19
GAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 58
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GAMR vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAMR	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.51	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	1.99	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.26	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	2.21	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	6.21	-5.57

GAMR vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAMR and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GAMR vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAMR drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAMR and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAMR	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-69.38%	+14.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.36%	-23.02%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.36%	-45.26%	+15.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.57%	-61.98%	+11.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.35%	-19.86%	+7.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.03%	-34.39%	+12.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.55%	8.18%	+5.37%

Volatility

GAMR vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) is 6.56%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 10.05%. This indicates that GAMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAMR	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.56%	10.05%	-3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.90%	27.20%	-8.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.88%	33.68%	-9.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.67%	30.01%	-5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.39%	30.78%	-6.39%

GAMR vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GAMR and BATT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

GAMR vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than BATT's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.77%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF	0.49%	0.52%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAMR and BATT in my portfolio?

GAMR and BATT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAMR or BATT?

BATT has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to GAMR (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAMR dropped -55.37% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which ETF is better, GAMR or BATT?

On 5-year performance, GAMR leads with 1.75% vs -2.30% for BATT. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAMR or BATT?

Over the 5-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 1.75% return vs -2.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAMR or BATT?

GAMR and BATT have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAMR or BATT?

BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.49% for GAMR.

What is the main difference between GAMR and BATT?

GAMR is categorized as Gaming, while BATT is Lithium & Battery Metals.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.