GAID vs. EFAS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

GAID (Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Dividend funds. GAID is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GAID charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

GAID vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GAID

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EFAS

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 7.15%
• 6M: 14.33%
• YTD: 21.51%
• 1Y: 31.62%
• 3Y*: 26.08%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	$906.61K	$548.31K	$417.70K

GAID vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GAID Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF	-1.34%	0.04%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	21.51%	1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GAID and EFAS is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

GAID vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GAID

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 93
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GAID vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAID	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.06	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.51	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.71	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GAID	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-44.38%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.12%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.98%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GAID	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	10.96%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.52%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.23%	—

GAID vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAID vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

GAID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than EFAS's 4.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.49%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%
GAID Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAID and EFAS in my portfolio?

GAID and EFAS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GAID or EFAS?

On fees, GAID is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAID or EFAS?

GAID is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAID or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.65% for GAID.

What is the main difference between GAID and EFAS?

They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GAID and 0.55% for EFAS.