PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAID vs. GARA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAID vs. GARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID) and Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAID achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than GARA's 10.92% return.


GAID

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.44%
6M
-2.73%
YTD
-1.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GARA

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.37%
6M
9.13%
YTD
10.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAID vs. GARA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GAID and GARA is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAID vs. GARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID) and Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GAID vs. GARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAID vs. GARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAID drawdown since its inception was -13.61%, which is greater than GARA's maximum drawdown of -7.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAID and GARA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAIDGARADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.61%

-7.87%

-5.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-1.12%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-1.75%

-2.67%

Volatility

GAID vs. GARA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAIDGARADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

12.91%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

12.91%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

12.91%

+2.60%

GAID vs. GARA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GAID and GARA have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

GAID vs. GARA - Dividend Comparison

GAID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than GARA's 1.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GAID and GARA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GAID and GARA have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

GARA has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.65% for GAID.

GAID is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GARA is Global Equity Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAID and GARA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer