GAID vs. DIVB
GAID (Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both Dividend funds. GAID is actively managed, while DIVB is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GAID charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.
Performance
GAID vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAID achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 21.57% return.
GAID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVB
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- YTD
- 21.57%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- —
GAID vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GAID Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF | -1.34% | 0.04% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 21.57% | -0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAID and DIVB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAID vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank
GAID
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVB
GAID vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF (GAID) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAID | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAID vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAID drawdown since its inception was -13.61%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAID and DIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAID | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -36.93% | +23.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -0.45% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -4.94% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
GAID vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAID | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 12.17% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 15.35% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 18.35% | -2.84% |
GAID vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAID vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison
GAID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than DIVB's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.18% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% |
GAID Guinness Atkinson International Dividend Builder ETF | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAID and DIVB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GAID.
DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.65% for GAID.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GAID and 0.05% for DIVB.
Find the right allocation for GAID and DIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer