GAA vs. EAOA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. GAA is actively managed, while EAOA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAA returned 6.37%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for EAOA. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.

Performance

GAA vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than EAOA's 9.93% return.

GAA

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 14.43%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 7.72%

EAOA

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAA vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF	9.39%	18.76%	6.67%	7.65%	-8.47%	11.17%	16.29%
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	9.93%	18.41%	13.79%	18.27%	-17.76%	14.52%	19.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GAA and EAOA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020	0.59

The correlation between GAA and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

GAA vs. EAOA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GAA	EAOA
Financial Services	17.5%	13.5%
Industrials	14.2%	9.0%
Real Estate	13.9%	1.6%
Energy	13.2%	3.0%
Basic Materials	9.7%	2.4%
Technology	8.7%	28.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	7.7%
Communication Services	4.0%	7.3%
Utilities	3.8%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	3.7%
Healthcare	3.2%	6.8%

Return for Risk

GAA vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAA

GAA Risk / Return Rank: 76
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

EAOA

EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAA vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GAA	EAOA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.28	+0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.21	+0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.41	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	3.00	+0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.04	13.30	+1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GAA vs. EAOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAA Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the EAOA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAA and EAOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GAA	EAOA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.28	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.65	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.93	-0.29

Drawdowns

GAA vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, which is greater than EAOA's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and EAOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAA	EAOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.57%	-25.06%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.78%	-8.17%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.18%	-13.84%	+6.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.47%	-25.06%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.71%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-5.31%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	1.84%	-0.33%

Volatility

GAA vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) is 2.60%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that GAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAA	EAOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	3.39%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.41%	8.64%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.19%	10.75%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.28%	13.25%	-1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.09%	13.14%	-2.05%

GAA vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAA vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than EAOA's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	1.95%	2.10%	2.09%	2.21%	1.93%	1.48%	1.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF	3.59%	4.24%	3.88%	3.73%	6.05%	4.21%	2.73%	3.32%	3.01%	2.36%	2.82%	2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAA and EAOA in my portfolio?

GAA and EAOA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAA or EAOA?

EAOA has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to GAA (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAA dropped -26.57% vs EAOA's -25.06%.

Which ETF is better, GAA or EAOA?

On 5-year performance, EAOA leads with 8.52% vs 6.37% for GAA. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, GAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAA or EAOA?

Over the 5-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAA or EAOA?

EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for GAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAA or EAOA?

GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.

What is the main difference between GAA and EAOA?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.18% for EAOA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.