GAA vs. OCIO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and OCIO (ClearShares OCIO ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAA returned 6.65%/yr vs 7.67%/yr for OCIO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for OCIO.

Performance

GAA vs. OCIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GAA having a 9.54% return and OCIO slightly higher at 10.00%.

GAA

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 10.07%
• 1Y: 20.97%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 6.65%
• 10Y*: 7.83%

OCIO

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 10.00%
• 6M: 9.92%
• 1Y: 22.19%
• 3Y*: 14.00%
• 5Y*: 7.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAA vs. OCIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF	9.54%	18.76%	6.67%	7.65%	-8.47%	11.17%	9.11%	15.12%	-7.15%	7.78%
OCIO ClearShares OCIO ETF	10.00%	12.68%	12.76%	12.03%	-12.49%	13.20%	11.54%	18.56%	-10.35%	8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GAA and OCIO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017	0.57

The correlation between GAA and OCIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GAA vs. OCIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAA

GAA Risk / Return Rank: 74
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

OCIO

OCIO Risk / Return Rank: 69
OCIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
OCIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
OCIO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
OCIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
OCIO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAA vs. OCIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GAA	OCIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.13	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	2.98	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.40	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	3.19	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.71	13.68	+0.03

GAA vs. OCIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the OCIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAA and OCIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GAA vs. OCIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, which is greater than OCIO's maximum drawdown of -24.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and OCIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GAA	OCIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.57%	-24.21%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.78%	-6.98%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.18%	-13.32%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.47%	-18.75%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	0.00%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-4.42%	+0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	1.63%	-0.10%

Volatility

GAA vs. OCIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) is 3.14%, while ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that GAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OCIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GAA	OCIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	4.69%	-1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.80%	8.71%	-0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.27%	10.51%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.32%	10.76%	+0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.12%	11.41%	-0.29%

GAA vs. OCIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than OCIO's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

GAA vs. OCIO - Dividend Comparison

GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than OCIO's 9.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF	3.58%	4.24%	3.88%	3.73%	6.05%	4.21%	2.73%	3.32%	3.01%	2.36%	2.82%	2.49%
OCIO ClearShares OCIO ETF	9.42%	10.27%	1.87%	2.32%	3.21%	2.83%	2.90%	2.22%	0.01%	1.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GAA and OCIO in my portfolio?

GAA and OCIO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GAA or OCIO?

OCIO has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to GAA (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAA dropped -26.57% vs OCIO's -24.21%.

Which ETF is better, GAA or OCIO?

On 5-year performance, OCIO leads with 7.67% vs 6.65% for GAA. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, GAA has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GAA or OCIO?

Over the 5-year period, OCIO has performed better with a 7.67% return vs 6.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GAA or OCIO?

GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for OCIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GAA or OCIO?

OCIO has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 3.58% for GAA.

What is the main difference between GAA and OCIO?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and ClearShares LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.61% for OCIO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.