GAA vs. EAOM
GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. GAA is actively managed, while EAOM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAA returned 6.12%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for EAOM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOM.
Performance
GAA vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than EAOM's 4.48% return.
GAA
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
EAOM
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 13.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- —
GAA vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 6.98% | 18.76% | 6.67% | 7.65% | -8.47% | 11.17% | 15.24% |
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 4.48% | 12.90% | 7.29% | 11.83% | -15.48% | 6.39% | 10.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAA and EAOM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between GAA and EAOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAA vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank
GAA
EAOM
GAA vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAA | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.52 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 10.90 | +0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAA vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, which is greater than EAOM's maximum drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and EAOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAA | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.57% | -20.73% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -5.17% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.18% | -7.63% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -20.73% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -1.01% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -4.93% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 1.20% | +0.34% |
Volatility
GAA vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) at 2.76%. This indicates that GAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAA | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 2.76% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 5.72% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.56% | 6.84% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 8.14% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 7.94% | +3.18% |
GAA vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAA vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison
GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than EAOM's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.80% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.67% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAA and EAOM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAA has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to EAOM (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAA dropped -26.57% vs EAOM's -20.73%.
On 5-year performance, GAA leads with 6.12% vs 4.08% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOM has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GAA has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for GAA.
GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.80% for EAOM.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.18% for EAOM.
EAOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAA and EAOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer