PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXZ vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXZ vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 17.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FXZ has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 10.25%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 18.38% annualized return.


FXZ

1D
-1.69%
1M
-2.68%
6M
7.26%
YTD
18.92%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
10.25%
ALL TIME*
8.86%

GRID

1D
1.53%
1M
-2.62%
6M
9.29%
YTD
17.75%
1Y
28.13%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
18.38%
ALL TIME*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.44M$3.68M$4.56M
$98.53M$102.24M$137.97M

FXZ vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
18.92%16.25%-16.31%16.27%-0.92%30.84%22.52%21.52%-22.62%23.72%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
17.75%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FXZ and GRID is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.66

The correlation between FXZ and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXZ vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXZ
GRID

Basic Materials

72.3%
0.8%

Industrials

23.4%
23.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
2.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

12.6%

Utilities

-

3.9%

Basic Materials

FXZ
72.3%
GRID
0.8%

Industrials

FXZ
23.4%
GRID
23.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FXZ
4.3%
GRID
2.4%

Communication Services

FXZ

-

GRID

-

Consumer Defensive

FXZ

-

GRID

-

Energy

FXZ

-

GRID
1.6%

Financial Services

FXZ

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

FXZ

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

FXZ

-

GRID

-

Technology

FXZ

-

GRID
12.6%

Utilities

FXZ

-

GRID
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXZ vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXZ
FXZ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXZ vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXZGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.22

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.73

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

6.17

+2.48

FXZ vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXZ and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXZ vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXZGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.46%

-40.56%

-24.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-15.82%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.99%

-20.62%

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.99%

-29.64%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.41%

-40.56%

-8.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.42%

-9.87%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-8.42%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

4.42%

-0.29%

Volatility

FXZ vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) is 6.20%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that FXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXZGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

8.92%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.54%

20.34%

-2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

23.07%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.15%

21.71%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.94%

22.81%

+2.13%

FXZ vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXZ vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
1.42%1.74%1.81%1.97%1.56%1.11%1.51%1.58%1.38%1.01%1.19%1.26%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXZ and GRID have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to FXZ (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 18.38% vs 10.25% for FXZ. On fees, FXZ is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, FXZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 18.38% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXZ is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

FXZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

FXZ is categorized as Materials, while GRID is Infrastructure Equities. FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.70% for GRID.

FXZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXZ and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer