FXP vs. QLD
FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - FXP is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXP returned -22.22%/yr vs 33.47%/yr for QLD. Their -0.56 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
FXP vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 31.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FXP has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -22.22%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 33.47% annualized return.
FXP
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -23.97%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- -1.26%
- 3Y*
- -27.96%
- 5Y*
- -21.08%
- 10Y*
- -22.22%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.45%
QLD
- 1D
- 6.74%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 31.34%
- YTD
- 31.43%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 42.34%
- 5Y*
- 19.16%
- 10Y*
- 33.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $103.24K | $95.91K | $96.09K | |
| $439.83M | $394.41M | $441.82M |
FXP vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 6.18% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 12.45% | -49.76% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 31.43% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXP and QLD is -0.39, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2007 | -0.56 |
The correlation between FXP and QLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.56 (all time) to -0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXP vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
FXP
QLD
FXP vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.23 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 2.06 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 6.06 | -6.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXP vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -83.13% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.65% | -25.13% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.34% | -42.29% | -40.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.85% | -63.68% | -24.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.56% | -63.68% | -29.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -7.97% | -91.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.18% | -18.10% | -76.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.62% | 8.53% | +3.09% |
Volatility
FXP vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) is 10.97%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 15.17%. This indicates that FXP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 15.17% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.41% | 32.66% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.60% | 39.07% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.72% | 45.90% | +16.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.81% | 45.04% | +9.77% |
FXP vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FXP and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
FXP vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 3.39% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXP and QLD have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (15.17%) compared to FXP (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXP dropped -99.94% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 33.47% vs -22.22% for FXP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, FXP has been the lower-risk option at 10.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 33.47% return vs -22.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXP and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
FXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.
FXP is categorized as China Equities, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXP and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer