FXL vs. TCHP
FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXL is a Technology Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Technology Index, while TCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. FXL is passively managed, while TCHP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FXL returned 13.48%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for TCHP. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for TCHP.
Performance
FXL vs. TCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than TCHP's 3.99% return.
FXL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 17.50%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 48.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
TCHP
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
FXL vs. TCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 31.98% | 13.29% | 16.13% | 40.50% | -30.44% | 18.20% | 22.37% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 3.99% | 18.40% | 36.06% | 50.10% | -37.81% | 18.08% | 11.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXL and TCHP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FXL and TCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FXL vs. TCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXL
TCHP
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FXL
TCHP
Communication Services
FXL
TCHP
Industrials
FXL
TCHP
Consumer Cyclical
FXL
TCHP
Financial Services
FXL
TCHP
Basic Materials
FXL
-
TCHP
Consumer Defensive
FXL
-
TCHP
Energy
FXL
-
TCHP
-
Healthcare
FXL
-
TCHP
Real Estate
FXL
-
TCHP
-
Utilities
FXL
-
TCHP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXL vs. TCHP — Risk / Return Rank
FXL
TCHP
FXL vs. TCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXL | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 1.15 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | 3.84 | +8.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXL | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.25 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.50 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.57 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FXL vs. TCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than TCHP's maximum drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and TCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXL | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -42.34% | -19.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.56% | -17.50% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | -22.92% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | -42.34% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -2.21% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -11.47% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 5.23% | -1.20% |
Volatility
FXL vs. TCHP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) at 3.84%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXL | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 3.84% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 12.20% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 16.12% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 23.43% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 23.18% | +2.10% |
FXL vs. TCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than TCHP's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXL vs. TCHP - Dividend Comparison
Neither FXL nor TCHP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXL and TCHP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to TCHP (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs TCHP's -42.34%.
On 5-year performance, FXL leads with 13.48% vs 11.66% for TCHP. On fees, TCHP is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, TCHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXL has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TCHP is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
FXL and TCHP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while TCHP is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.57% for TCHP.
FXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXL and TCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer