PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. QTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly lower than QTEC's 29.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has underperformed QTEC with an annualized return of 19.60%, while QTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.


FXL

1D
1.36%
1M
-2.51%
6M
17.90%
YTD
18.85%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
19.60%
ALL TIME*
13.00%

QTEC

1D
0.27%
1M
-5.23%
6M
26.76%
YTD
29.69%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
21.00%
ALL TIME*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.02M$18.35M$33.60M
$78.15M$73.99M$89.17M

FXL vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
18.85%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
29.69%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and QTEC is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.92

The correlation between FXL and QTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. QTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
QTEC

Technology

90.1%
85.4%

Communication Services

5.0%
8.3%

Industrials

3.6%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
2.1%

Financial Services

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FXL
90.1%
QTEC
85.4%

Communication Services

FXL
5.0%
QTEC
8.3%

Industrials

FXL
3.6%
QTEC
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
0.9%
QTEC
2.1%

Financial Services

FXL
0.4%
QTEC

-

Basic Materials

FXL

-

QTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

QTEC

-

Energy

FXL

-

QTEC

-

Healthcare

FXL

-

QTEC

-

Real Estate

FXL

-

QTEC

-

Utilities

FXL

-

QTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXL vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXLQTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.46

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.70

6.90

-2.20

FXL vs. QTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the QTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and QTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXL vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, roughly equal to the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and QTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLQTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-58.86%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.21%

-16.03%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-29.00%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-45.54%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

-45.54%

+7.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.74%

-11.08%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-9.86%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

5.72%

-0.42%

Volatility

FXL vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) is 8.61%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that FXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLQTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

9.69%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.24%

23.97%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.76%

28.24%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.76%

30.05%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

27.88%

-2.36%

FXL vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.01%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FXL and QTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QTEC has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to FXL (8.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs QTEC's -58.86%.

On 10-year performance, QTEC leads with 21.00% vs 19.60% for FXL. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, FXL has been the lower-risk option at 8.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 19.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

QTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while QTEC is Nasdaq-100. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.57% for QTEC.

QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and QTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer