PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXL vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXL vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 21.15%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.26% annualized return.


FXL

1D
-0.88%
1M
17.50%
YTD
31.98%
6M
30.18%
1Y
48.07%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
21.15%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXL vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
31.98%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and VUG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.86

The correlation between FXL and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXL vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXL
VUG

Technology

88.1%
53.5%

Communication Services

5.9%
17.3%

Industrials

4.5%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
12.2%

Financial Services

0.6%
4.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.5%

Energy

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

4.6%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Technology

FXL
88.1%
VUG
53.5%

Communication Services

FXL
5.9%
VUG
17.3%

Industrials

FXL
4.5%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FXL
1.0%
VUG
12.2%

Financial Services

FXL
0.6%
VUG
4.3%

Basic Materials

FXL

-

VUG
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

FXL

-

VUG
1.5%

Energy

FXL

-

VUG
0.4%

Healthcare

FXL

-

VUG
4.6%

Real Estate

FXL

-

VUG
1.0%

Utilities

FXL

-

VUG
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXL vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXL vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXLVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

1.77

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.84

2.40

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

1.69

+1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.95

5.92

+6.02

FXL vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXLVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.77

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.68

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.85

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Drawdowns

FXL vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXLVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-50.68%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-16.53%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-22.85%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-35.61%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.49%

-35.61%

-2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.51%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-7.09%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

4.71%

-0.68%

Volatility

FXL vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXLVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

3.83%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.47%

12.11%

+5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

15.84%

+6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

22.22%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.28%

21.44%

+3.84%

FXL vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXL vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXL and VUG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 21.15% vs 18.26% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 18.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.03% for VUG.

FXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXL and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer