FXL vs. VUG
FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXL is a Technology Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Technology Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXL returned 21.15%/yr vs 18.26%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
FXL vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FXL has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 21.15%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.26% annualized return.
FXL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 17.50%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 48.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 21.15%
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
FXL vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 31.98% | 13.29% | 16.13% | 40.50% | -30.44% | 18.20% | 54.20% | 38.66% | 2.72% | 35.82% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXL and VUG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FXL and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXL vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXL
VUG
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FXL
VUG
Communication Services
FXL
VUG
Industrials
FXL
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
FXL
VUG
Financial Services
FXL
VUG
Basic Materials
FXL
-
VUG
Consumer Defensive
FXL
-
VUG
Energy
FXL
-
VUG
Healthcare
FXL
-
VUG
Real Estate
FXL
-
VUG
Utilities
FXL
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXL vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
FXL
VUG
FXL vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 1.77 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.84 | 2.40 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 1.69 | +1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | 5.92 | +6.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.77 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.68 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.85 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.62 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FXL vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -50.68% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.56% | -16.53% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | -22.85% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.49% | -35.61% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.49% | -35.61% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -1.51% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -7.09% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 4.71% | -0.68% |
Volatility
FXL vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXL | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 3.83% | +3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 12.11% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 15.84% | +6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 22.22% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 21.44% | +3.84% |
FXL vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXL vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.27% | 1.12% | 0.36% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXL and VUG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXL has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, FXL leads with 21.15% vs 18.26% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXL has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 18.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.
FXL is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.03% for VUG.
FXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXL and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer