FXL vs. GXPT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FXL (First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - FXL tracks the StrataQuant Technology Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FXL returned 27.83% vs 29.12% for GXPT. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FXL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.

Performance

FXL vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXL achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 15.96% return.

FXL

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -2.51%
• 6M: 17.90%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 1Y: 27.83%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: 19.60%
• ALL TIME*: 13.00%

GXPT

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: 18.54%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 1Y: 29.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund	$26.02M	$18.35M	$33.60M
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	$16.90M	$9.61M	$5.72M

FXL vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund	18.85%	5.97%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	15.96%	11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FXL and GXPT is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.82

The correlation between FXL and GXPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FXL vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXL

FXL Risk / Return Rank: 40
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

GXPT

GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 42
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXL vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FXL	GXPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.13	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.64	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.20	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	1.42	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.70	3.74	+0.96

FXL vs. GXPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the GXPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXL and GXPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FXL vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXL drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXL and GXPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FXL	GXPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.41%	-18.74%	-42.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.21%	-18.74%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.74%	-9.42%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.34%	-5.45%	-5.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.30%	7.11%	-1.81%

Volatility

FXL vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) at 7.73%. This indicates that FXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FXL	GXPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.61%	7.73%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.24%	19.35%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.76%	23.54%	+2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.76%	23.29%	+2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.52%	23.29%	+2.23%

FXL vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXL vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund	0.00%	0.01%	0.11%	0.41%	0.34%	0.11%	0.04%	0.37%	0.32%	0.27%	1.12%	0.36%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.22%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FXL and GXPT in my portfolio?

FXL and GXPT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FXL or GXPT?

FXL has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to GXPT (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXL dropped -61.41% vs GXPT's -18.74%.

Which ETF is better, FXL or GXPT?

On 1-year performance, GXPT leads with 29.12% vs 27.83% for FXL. On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GXPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FXL or GXPT?

Over the 1-year period, GXPT has performed better with a 29.12% return vs 27.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FXL or GXPT?

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FXL or GXPT?

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

What is the main difference between FXL and GXPT?

FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXL and 0.15% for GXPT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GXPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.