PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXD vs. TMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXD vs. TMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FXD

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.79%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
7.89%

TMH

1D
-0.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXD vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FXD and TMH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXD vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

TMH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXD vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXDTMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

FXD vs. TMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXDTMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-5.39

+5.70

Drawdowns

FXD vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and TMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXDTMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.27%

-5.59%

-59.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.12%

-5.59%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-4.22%

-6.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

Volatility

FXD vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXDTMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

20.85%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.70%

20.85%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

20.85%

+2.82%

FXD vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXD vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison

FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%
TMH
Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXD and TMH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.

FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.

FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.19% for TMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXD and TMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer