FXD vs. TMH
FXD (First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - FXD tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FXD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
FXD vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FXD
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- -1.26%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXD vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | -2.12% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXD and TMH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXD vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
FXD
TMH
FXD vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXD | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXD | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | -5.39 | +5.70 |
Drawdowns
FXD vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXD | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.27% | -5.59% | -59.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.12% | -5.59% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.97% | -4.22% | -6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | — | — |
Volatility
FXD vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXD | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 20.85% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 20.85% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 20.85% | +2.82% |
FXD vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXD vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.78% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.42% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.90% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXD and TMH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.
FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for FXD and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer