FWIFX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
FWIFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
FWIFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWIFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWIFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I | -3.09% | 16.11% | 27.63% | 24.92% | -25.72% | 18.43% | 30.92% | 28.94% | -4.56% | 29.58% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWIFX achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FWIFX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 12.89%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
FWIFX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -1.91%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWIFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWIFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FWIFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
FWIFX
FGIAX
FWIFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWIFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.75 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 2.26 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.61 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | 12.12 | -4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWIFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.75 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.80 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.58 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.42 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWIFX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWIFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
FWIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWIFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I | 12.00% | 11.63% | 14.80% | 0.93% | 6.23% | 12.86% | 8.16% | 4.93% | 9.72% | 6.94% | 1.17% | 3.88% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
FWIFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWIFX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWIFX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWIFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -49.35% | +15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.74% | -8.29% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.71% | -21.08% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.71% | -38.02% | +4.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.18% | -3.78% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -7.22% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 1.78% | +1.27% |
Volatility
FWIFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that FWIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWIFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 4.05% | +4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 7.09% | +6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.31% | 12.28% | +8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 13.08% | +5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 15.17% | +3.49% |