FWIFX vs. LAZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FWIFX (Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I) is Global Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while LAZ (Lazard Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FWIFX returned 15.13%/yr vs 8.79%/yr for LAZ. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FWIFX vs. LAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWIFX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than LAZ's -1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FWIFX has outperformed LAZ with an annualized return of 15.13%, while LAZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.79% annualized return.

FWIFX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 8.02%
• YTD: 20.77%
• 6M: 21.02%
• 1Y: 41.08%
• 3Y*: 25.45%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: 15.13%

LAZ

• 1D: -3.50%
• 1M: 8.72%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 6M: -10.25%
• 1Y: 12.14%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 4.78%
• 10Y*: 8.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWIFX vs. LAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FWIFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I	20.77%	16.11%	27.63%	24.92%	-25.72%	18.43%	30.92%	28.94%	-4.56%	29.58%
LAZ Lazard Ltd	-1.16%	-1.64%	54.83%	6.92%	-16.21%	7.41%	12.08%	15.22%	-25.38%	36.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FWIFX and LAZ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009	0.57

The correlation between FWIFX and LAZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FWIFX vs. LAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWIFX

FWIFX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FWIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FWIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FWIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FWIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FWIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

LAZ

LAZ Risk / Return Rank: 49
LAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
LAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWIFX vs. LAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWIFX	LAZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	0.33	+2.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	0.71	+2.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.08	+0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	0.39	+3.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.47	0.91	+14.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWIFX vs. LAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the LAZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWIFX and LAZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWIFX	LAZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	0.33	+2.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.13	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.24	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.18	+0.60

Drawdowns

FWIFX vs. LAZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWIFX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum LAZ drawdown of -62.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWIFX and LAZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWIFX	LAZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-62.72%	+29.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-31.39%	+19.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.63%	-44.24%	+21.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.71%	-44.24%	+10.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.71%	-59.51%	+25.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-17.26%	+17.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-23.47%	+17.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	13.30%	-10.59%

Volatility

FWIFX vs. LAZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I (FWIFX) is 6.04%, while Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a volatility of 10.64%. This indicates that FWIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWIFX	LAZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	10.64%	-4.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.72%	30.05%	-16.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	36.86%	-19.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.92%	36.81%	-17.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.81%	36.02%	-17.21%

Dividends

FWIFX vs. LAZ - Dividend Comparison

FWIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, more than LAZ's 4.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FWIFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class I	9.63%	11.63%	14.80%	0.93%	6.23%	12.86%	8.16%	4.93%	9.72%	6.94%	1.17%	3.88%
LAZ Lazard Ltd	4.25%	4.12%	3.89%	5.75%	5.60%	4.31%	4.44%	5.88%	8.21%	5.35%	6.55%	5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWIFX and LAZ in my portfolio?

FWIFX and LAZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FWIFX or LAZ?

LAZ has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to FWIFX (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWIFX dropped -33.71% vs LAZ's -62.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.