FWCFX vs. FGIAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FWCFX (Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C) and FGIAX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FWCFX returned 15.71%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for FGIAX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWCFX charges 2.08%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for FGIAX.

Performance

FWCFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWCFX achieves a 20.30% return, which is significantly higher than FGIAX's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FWCFX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 15.71%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.

FWCFX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 20.30%
• 6M: 20.40%
• 1Y: 39.69%
• 3Y*: 30.79%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: 15.71%

FGIAX

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 6M: 9.57%
• 1Y: 14.70%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 8.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWCFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FWCFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C	20.30%	14.91%	47.60%	23.61%	-26.54%	17.21%	29.53%	27.53%	-5.55%	28.20%
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	9.87%	17.73%	10.70%	8.51%	-6.23%	14.51%	-2.76%	29.32%	-7.91%	19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FWCFX and FGIAX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FWCFX and FGIAX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FWCFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWCFX

FWCFX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FWCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FWCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FWCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FWCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FWCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FGIAX

FGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWCFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWCFX	FGIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	1.39	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	1.99	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.25	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	2.39	+1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.74	8.11	+6.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWCFX vs. FGIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the FGIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWCFX and FGIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWCFX	FGIAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	1.39	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.70	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.55	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.41	+0.35

Drawdowns

FWCFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWCFX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWCFX and FGIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWCFX	FGIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.39%	-49.35%	+14.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.83%	-6.04%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.80%	-12.45%	-10.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.39%	-21.08%	-13.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.39%	-38.02%	+3.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.05%	+4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.45%	-7.17%	+0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	1.78%	+0.96%

Volatility

FWCFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 3.88%. This indicates that FWCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWCFX	FGIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	3.88%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.74%	8.65%	+5.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.40%	10.42%	+6.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.42%	13.24%	+7.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.58%	15.23%	+4.35%

FWCFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWCFX has a 2.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWCFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison

FWCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, less than FGIAX's 14.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	14.52%	9.99%	7.46%	2.27%	6.11%	7.20%	1.38%	7.06%	6.32%	5.83%	8.23%	3.05%
FWCFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C	10.08%	12.12%	29.90%	0.00%	5.87%	12.44%	7.99%	4.46%	9.67%	6.44%	0.05%	3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWCFX and FGIAX in my portfolio?

FWCFX and FGIAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FWCFX or FGIAX?

FWCFX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to FGIAX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWCFX dropped -34.39% vs FGIAX's -49.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.