FWCFX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FWCFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FWCFX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FWCFX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWCFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C | -7.06% | 14.91% | 47.60% | 23.61% | -26.54% | 17.21% | 29.53% | 27.53% | -5.55% | 28.20% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWCFX having a -7.06% return and FSKAX slightly higher at -6.77%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FWCFX having a 13.01% annualized return and FSKAX not far ahead at 13.23%.
FWCFX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -10.46%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -5.88%
- 1Y
- 16.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FWCFX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWCFX has a 2.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FWCFX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FWCFX
FSKAX
FWCFX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWCFX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.83 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 5.05 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWCFX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.83 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.59 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.78 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FWCFX and FSKAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FWCFX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FWCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.04%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWCFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C | 13.04% | 12.12% | 29.90% | 0.00% | 5.87% | 12.44% | 7.99% | 4.46% | 9.67% | 6.44% | 0.05% | 3.47% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FWCFX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWCFX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, roughly equal to the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWCFX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWCFX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.39% | -35.01% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -12.42% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.39% | -25.39% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.39% | -35.01% | +0.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.83% | -8.92% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -4.05% | -2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.57% | +0.46% |
Volatility
FWCFX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class C (FWCFX) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FWCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FWCFX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 4.42% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 9.40% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 18.50% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 17.38% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 18.42% | +0.97% |