FVD vs. TMVE
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - FVD tracks the Value Line Dividend Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.
Performance
FVD vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 17.39% return.
FVD
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
TMVE
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FVD vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 4.43% | 1.06% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 17.39% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and TMVE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
TMVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FVD vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVD | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVD vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and TMVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -8.21% | -42.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -0.69% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -1.43% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility
FVD vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.77% | 13.81% | -4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 13.81% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 13.81% | +1.63% |
FVD vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.26% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and TMVE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.55% for TMVE.
Find the right allocation for FVD and TMVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer