PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVD vs. SNPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVD vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than SNPD's 8.10% return.


FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%

SNPD

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.63%
YTD
8.10%
6M
8.48%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVD vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%4.68%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.10%6.66%5.41%2.68%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and SNPD is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.94

The correlation between FVD and SNPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FVD vs. SNPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVD
SNPD

Financial Services

19.1%
8.5%

Utilities

18.4%
14.4%

Industrials

14.2%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.6%
18.7%

Real Estate

8.1%
6.8%

Healthcare

7.8%
4.9%

Technology

6.1%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
8.7%

Energy

4.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
7.1%

Financial Services

FVD
19.1%
SNPD
8.5%

Utilities

FVD
18.4%
SNPD
14.4%

Industrials

FVD
14.2%
SNPD
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

FVD
11.6%
SNPD
18.7%

Real Estate

FVD
8.1%
SNPD
6.8%

Healthcare

FVD
7.8%
SNPD
4.9%

Technology

FVD
6.1%
SNPD
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FVD
5.6%
SNPD
8.7%

Energy

FVD
4.0%
SNPD
3.1%

Communication Services

FVD
3.0%
SNPD
3.4%

Basic Materials

FVD
2.1%
SNPD
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVD vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVD vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVDSNPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.58

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

4.72

-2.14

FVD vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and SNPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVDSNPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.24

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.57

+0.01

Drawdowns

FVD vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and SNPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDSNPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-15.80%

-35.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-8.68%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-15.80%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-3.20%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-3.94%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.90%

-0.24%

Volatility

FVD vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDSNPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.75%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

8.04%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

11.05%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

13.14%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

13.14%

+2.30%

FVD vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVD vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than SNPD's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.01%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FVD and SNPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNPD has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs SNPD's -15.80%.

On 3-year performance, SNPD leads with 8.75% vs 8.25% for FVD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SNPD has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.31% for FVD.

FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.15% for SNPD.

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVD and SNPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer