FVD vs. SNPD
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - FVD tracks the Value Line Dividend Index while SNPD tracks the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FVD returned 8.25%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for SNPD. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SNPD.
Performance
FVD vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than SNPD's 8.10% return.
FVD
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
SNPD
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FVD vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.21% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | 4.68% |
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.10% | 6.66% | 5.41% | 2.68% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and SNPD is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FVD and SNPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVD vs. SNPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVD
SNPD
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FVD
SNPD
Utilities
FVD
SNPD
Industrials
FVD
SNPD
Consumer Defensive
FVD
SNPD
Real Estate
FVD
SNPD
Healthcare
FVD
SNPD
Technology
FVD
SNPD
Consumer Cyclical
FVD
SNPD
Energy
FVD
SNPD
Communication Services
FVD
SNPD
Basic Materials
FVD
SNPD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
SNPD
FVD vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVD | SNPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.21 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 1.58 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 4.72 | -2.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVD | SNPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.24 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.57 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
FVD vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and SNPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | SNPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -15.80% | -35.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -8.68% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | -15.80% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -3.20% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.94% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.90% | -0.24% |
Volatility
FVD vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | SNPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.75% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.73% | 8.04% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 11.05% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 13.14% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 13.14% | +2.30% |
FVD vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than SNPD's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.31% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.01% | 3.10% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FVD and SNPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SNPD has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs SNPD's -15.80%.
On 3-year performance, SNPD leads with 8.75% vs 8.25% for FVD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SNPD has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.31% for FVD.
FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.15% for SNPD.
SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and SNPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer