FVD vs. RNIN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and RNIN (Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. FVD is passively managed, while RNIN is actively managed. Over the past year, FVD returned 9.84% vs 27.51% for RNIN. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for RNIN.

Performance

FVD vs. RNIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly lower than RNIN's 14.72% return.

FVD

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -1.17%
• YTD: 3.30%
• 6M: 2.96%
• 1Y: 9.84%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 5.99%
• 10Y*: 8.54%

RNIN

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 27.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVD vs. RNIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund	3.30%	6.94%
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	14.72%	10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and RNIN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.62

The correlation between FVD and RNIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FVD vs. RNIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVD

FVD Risk / Return Rank: 28
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 27

RNIN

RNIN Risk / Return Rank: 68
RNIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RNIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RNIN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
RNIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RNIN Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVD vs. RNIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FVD	RNIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.85	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	2.68	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.32	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	4.85	-3.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	16.24	-12.72

FVD vs. RNIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the RNIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and RNIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FVD vs. RNIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than RNIN's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and RNIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVD	RNIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.00%	-5.70%	-45.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-5.70%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.95%	-3.56%	-1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-1.29%	-4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	1.70%	+1.10%

Volatility

FVD vs. RNIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 3.12%, while Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVD	RNIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	4.83%	-1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.05%	10.63%	-3.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.73%	15.01%	-5.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.76%	14.91%	-2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	14.91%	+0.55%

FVD vs. RNIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than RNIN's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVD vs. RNIN - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than RNIN's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund	2.29%	2.36%	2.23%	2.34%	2.20%	1.75%	2.31%	2.03%	2.50%	2.10%	2.04%	2.34%
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	0.77%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVD and RNIN in my portfolio?

FVD and RNIN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FVD or RNIN?

RNIN has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to FVD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs RNIN's -5.70%.

Which ETF is better, FVD or RNIN?

On 1-year performance, RNIN leads with 27.51% vs 9.84% for FVD. On fees, FVD is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FVD or RNIN?

Over the 1-year period, RNIN has performed better with a 27.51% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FVD or RNIN?

FVD is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RNIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FVD or RNIN?

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.77% for RNIN.

What is the main difference between FVD and RNIN?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Bushido. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.68% for RNIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.