RNIN vs. FAB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RNIN (Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF) and FAB (First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. RNIN is actively managed, while FAB is passively managed. Over the past year, RNIN returned 27.06% vs 26.53% for FAB. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RNIN charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FAB.

Performance

RNIN vs. FAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNIN achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly higher than FAB's 12.76% return.

RNIN

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 15.44%
• 6M: 14.30%
• 1Y: 27.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAB

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 12.76%
• 6M: 12.00%
• 1Y: 26.53%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: 11.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNIN vs. FAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	15.44%	10.92%
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	12.76%	13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RNIN and FAB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.85

The correlation between RNIN and FAB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RNIN vs. FAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNIN

RNIN Risk / Return Rank: 71
RNIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RNIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RNIN Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RNIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RNIN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FAB

FAB Risk / Return Rank: 69
FAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FAB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FAB Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNIN vs. FAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) and First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNIN	FAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.93	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	2.93	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	4.01	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.88	12.40	+3.48

RNIN vs. FAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNIN and FAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNIN vs. FAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNIN drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum FAB drawdown of -63.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNIN and FAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNIN	FAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-63.29%	+57.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	-6.65%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.96%	-1.38%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-9.23%	+7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	2.15%	-0.44%

Volatility

RNIN vs. FAB - Volatility Comparison

Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) at 3.30%. This indicates that RNIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNIN	FAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	3.30%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	8.70%	+1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.98%	13.81%	+1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.89%	18.67%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.89%	22.02%	-7.13%

RNIN vs. FAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNIN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FAB's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNIN vs. FAB - Dividend Comparison

RNIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than FAB's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.56%	1.57%	2.00%	1.94%	1.80%	1.32%	1.59%	1.75%	1.96%	1.42%	1.40%	1.62%
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF	0.77%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNIN and FAB in my portfolio?

RNIN and FAB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNIN or FAB?

RNIN has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to FAB (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNIN dropped -5.70% vs FAB's -63.29%.

Which ETF is better, RNIN or FAB?

On 1-year performance, RNIN leads with 27.06% vs 26.53% for FAB. On fees, FAB is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, FAB has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNIN or FAB?

Over the 1-year period, RNIN has performed better with a 27.06% return vs 26.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNIN or FAB?

FAB is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RNIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNIN or FAB?

FAB has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.77% for RNIN.

What is the main difference between RNIN and FAB?

They also come from different issuers: Bushido and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for RNIN and 0.64% for FAB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.