FVD vs. NIXT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and NIXT (Research Affiliates Deletions ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - FVD tracks the Value Line Dividend Index while NIXT tracks the Research Affiliates Deletions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FVD returned 6.84% vs 33.50% for NIXT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for NIXT.

Performance

FVD vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 18.29% return.

FVD

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 6M: 2.80%
• 1Y: 6.84%
• 3Y*: 8.25%
• 5Y*: 5.20%
• 10Y*: 8.30%

NIXT

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 18.29%
• 6M: 17.24%
• 1Y: 33.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVD vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund	2.21%	8.16%	-0.85%
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF	18.29%	4.94%	4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and NIXT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	0.64

The correlation between FVD and NIXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FVD vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVD

FVD Risk / Return Rank: 21
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 21

NIXT

NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 50
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 41
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVD vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FVD	NIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	1.59	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	2.34	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.27	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	2.87	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	9.69	-7.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVD vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FVD	NIXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	1.59	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.71	-0.13

Drawdowns

FVD vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than NIXT's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and NIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVD	NIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.00%	-27.75%	-23.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-11.71%	+4.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.96%	-2.37%	-3.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-5.96%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.47%	-0.81%

Volatility

FVD vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 2.62%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVD	NIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	5.00%	-2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.73%	14.08%	-7.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.50%	21.24%	-11.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.76%	23.31%	-10.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.44%	23.31%	-7.87%

FVD vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVD vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than NIXT's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund	2.31%	2.36%	2.23%	2.34%	2.20%	1.75%	2.31%	2.03%	2.50%	2.10%	2.04%	2.34%
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF	1.35%	1.64%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVD and NIXT in my portfolio?

FVD and NIXT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FVD or NIXT?

NIXT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

Which ETF is better, FVD or NIXT?

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 33.50% vs 6.84% for FVD. On fees, NIXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FVD or NIXT?

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FVD or NIXT?

NIXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FVD or NIXT?

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.35% for NIXT.

What is the main difference between FVD and NIXT?

FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.09% for NIXT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NIXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.