FVD vs. MUU
FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FVD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Value Line Dividend Index, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FVD returned 11.06% vs 3083.51% for MUU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FVD charges 0.61%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
FVD vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 642.75% return.
FVD
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
MUU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -10.27%
- 6M
- 421.21%
- YTD
- 642.75%
- 1Y
- 3,083.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FVD vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 7.55% | 8.16% | -2.52% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 642.75% | 599.03% | -40.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and MUU is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024 | 0.07 |
The correlation between FVD and MUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVD vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
FVD
MUU
FVD vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVD | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -26.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.72 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 75.03 | -73.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 245.78 | -242.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVD vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVD | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -75.07% | +24.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -52.72% | +45.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -30.01% | +28.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -23.40% | +17.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 16.41% | -13.57% |
Volatility
FVD vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 3.72%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.23%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVD | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 67.23% | -63.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 116.08% | -108.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.90% | 145.04% | -135.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 138.03% | -125.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 138.03% | -122.60% |
FVD vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVD vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than MUU's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.28% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.64% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVD and MUU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (67.23%) compared to FVD (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs MUU's -75.07%.
On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3083.51% vs 11.06% for FVD. On fees, FVD is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3083.51% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FVD is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.64% for MUU.
FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 1.01% for MUU.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (27.27 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVD and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer