PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FV vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FV vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FV has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 13.39%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.


FV

1D
0.07%
1M
1.47%
YTD
15.29%
6M
13.53%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
13.39%

SPYG

1D
-0.20%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
8.49%
6M
6.97%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
25.40%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
18.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FV vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
15.29%7.23%14.73%11.34%-3.93%21.63%28.36%25.73%-8.27%19.97%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.49%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FV and SPYG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014

0.82

The correlation between FV and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FV vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FV
SPYG

Energy

34.8%
0.1%

Technology

23.5%
52.1%

Healthcare

20.5%
5.9%

Financial Services

19.8%
9.0%

Industrials

13.9%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
8.5%

Communication Services

6.3%
15.9%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Energy

FV
34.8%
SPYG
0.1%

Technology

FV
23.5%
SPYG
52.1%

Healthcare

FV
20.5%
SPYG
5.9%

Financial Services

FV
19.8%
SPYG
9.0%

Industrials

FV
13.9%
SPYG
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FV
7.4%
SPYG
8.5%

Communication Services

FV
6.3%
SPYG
15.9%

Real Estate

FV
0.7%
SPYG
0.6%

Basic Materials

FV

-

SPYG
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FV

-

SPYG
1.0%

Utilities

FV

-

SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FV vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FV
FV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FV vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.81

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

7.15

-0.28

FV vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FV and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FV vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.04%

-67.63%

+33.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-13.76%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.08%

-22.14%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-32.67%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-32.67%

-1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-5.71%

+3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-24.28%

+18.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.48%

+0.13%

Volatility

FV vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) is 6.63%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that FV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

7.26%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

13.85%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

17.22%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.91%

21.36%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.47%

20.72%

+0.75%

FV vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FV vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
0.53%0.63%0.14%0.47%1.38%0.11%0.06%0.56%0.19%0.67%0.95%0.14%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FV and SPYG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FV (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.03% vs 13.39% for FV. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FV has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

FV has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.

FV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.04% for SPYG.

FV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FV and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer