FV vs. SYLD
FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) and SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. FV is passively managed, while SYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FV returned 13.23%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for SYLD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FV charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SYLD.
Performance
FV vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 15.81% return, which is significantly higher than SYLD's 13.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FV having a 13.23% annualized return and SYLD not far behind at 13.10%.
FV
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 15.81%
- 6M
- 17.37%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 25.41%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
FV vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 15.81% | 7.23% | 14.73% | 11.34% | -3.93% | 21.63% | 28.36% | 25.73% | -8.27% | 19.97% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 13.56% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FV and SYLD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FV and SYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FV vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FV
SYLD
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
FV
SYLD
Technology
FV
SYLD
Healthcare
FV
SYLD
Financial Services
FV
SYLD
Industrials
FV
SYLD
Consumer Cyclical
FV
SYLD
Communication Services
FV
SYLD
Real Estate
FV
SYLD
-
Basic Materials
FV
-
SYLD
Consumer Defensive
FV
-
SYLD
Utilities
FV
-
SYLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FV vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank
FV
SYLD
FV vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FV | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 3.68 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 9.92 | -2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FV vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and SYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FV | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -45.36% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -6.93% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.08% | -26.62% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.08% | -26.62% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -45.36% | +11.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -3.10% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -5.65% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.57% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FV vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 3.75%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FV | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 3.75% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 9.81% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 15.62% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 20.53% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 22.96% | -1.48% |
FV vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FV vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison
FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SYLD's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.14% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.86% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FV and SYLD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FV has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to SYLD (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs SYLD's -45.36%.
On 10-year performance, FV leads with 13.23% vs 13.10% for SYLD. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FV has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.53% for FV.
FV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.59% for SYLD.
FV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FV and SYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer