PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FV vs. SYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FV vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 23.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FV has underperformed SYLD with an annualized return of 12.32%, while SYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.


FV

1D
-0.01%
1M
-4.97%
6M
3.17%
YTD
10.81%
1Y
14.67%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
12.32%
ALL TIME*
11.06%

SYLD

1D
1.39%
1M
5.77%
6M
17.14%
YTD
23.39%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
12.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.34M$4.74M$5.14M
$2.50M$2.29M$3.61M

FV vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
10.81%7.23%14.73%11.34%-3.93%21.63%28.36%25.73%-8.27%19.97%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
23.39%3.94%3.37%16.46%-6.14%48.59%13.61%26.98%-13.51%20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FV and SYLD is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between FV and SYLD has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FV vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FV
SYLD

Technology

54.8%
3.1%

Healthcare

20.5%
6.0%

Industrials

14.5%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
23.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
7.2%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Energy

0.1%
13.1%

Financial Services

0.1%
22.2%

Basic Materials

-

7.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.8%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FV
54.8%
SYLD
3.1%

Healthcare

FV
20.5%
SYLD
6.0%

Industrials

FV
14.5%
SYLD
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FV
7.3%
SYLD
23.9%

Communication Services

FV
2.6%
SYLD
7.2%

Real Estate

FV
0.7%
SYLD

-

Energy

FV
0.1%
SYLD
13.1%

Financial Services

FV
0.1%
SYLD
22.2%

Basic Materials

FV

-

SYLD
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

FV

-

SYLD
8.8%

Utilities

FV

-

SYLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FV vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FV
FV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FV vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVSYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

4.21

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.68

12.19

-8.50

FV vs. SYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the SYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FV and SYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FV vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and SYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVSYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.04%

-45.36%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-6.93%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.08%

-26.62%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-26.62%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-45.36%

+11.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.29%

0.00%

-8.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-5.61%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

2.43%

+1.56%

Volatility

FV vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 3.86%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVSYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

3.86%

+3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

9.22%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

15.06%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

20.27%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

22.92%

-1.37%

FV vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FV vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison

FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SYLD's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
0.52%0.63%0.14%0.47%1.38%0.11%0.06%0.56%0.19%0.67%0.95%0.14%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.80%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FV and SYLD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FV has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to SYLD (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs SYLD's -45.36%.

On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.65% vs 12.32% for FV. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.65% return vs 12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.52% for FV.

FV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.59% for SYLD.

SYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FV and SYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer