FUTU vs. CLS
FUTU (Futu Holdings Limited) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. FUTU operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, FUTU returned -6.95%/yr vs 116.26%/yr for CLS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUTU vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTU achieves a -39.65% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 32.99% return.
FUTU
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -31.67%
- YTD
- -39.65%
- 6M
- -42.20%
- 1Y
- -13.16%
- 3Y*
- 34.68%
- 5Y*
- -6.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 200.71%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
FUTU vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTU Futu Holdings Limited | -39.65% | 105.29% | 49.87% | 34.39% | -6.12% | -5.36% | 343.31% | -30.08% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTU and CLS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
FUTU:
$13.82B
CLS:
$45.48B
FUTU:
HK$71.05
CLS:
$8.28
FUTU:
10.76
CLS:
47.45
FUTU:
0.22
CLS:
0.64
FUTU:
4.50
CLS:
3.30
FUTU:
2.63
CLS:
21.68
FUTU:
HK$24.01B
CLS:
$13.81B
FUTU:
HK$21.07B
CLS:
$1.60B
FUTU:
HK$14.81B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTU vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
FUTU
CLS
FUTU vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUTU | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.37 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 6.91 | -7.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 16.83 | -17.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTU vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTU drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTU and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTU | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.23% | -96.93% | +9.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.18% | -29.24% | -24.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.18% | -53.96% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.42% | -53.96% | -32.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.21% | -16.78% | -33.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.53% | -73.31% | +25.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.61% | 11.98% | +8.63% |
Volatility
FUTU vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) has a higher volatility of 39.14% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 27.54%. This indicates that FUTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTU | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.14% | 27.54% | +11.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.00% | 55.42% | -4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.08% | 72.65% | -9.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.75% | 57.70% | +15.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.16% | 49.97% | +25.19% |
Dividends
FUTU vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
FUTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUTU Futu Holdings Limited | 2.67% | 0.00% | 2.50% |
Financials
FUTU vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Futu Holdings Limited and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FUTU vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
FUTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 5.11B and revenue of 5.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.2%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
FUTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 3.53B and revenue of 5.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
FUTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported a net income of 850.55M and revenue of 5.86B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTU and CLS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUTU has higher volatility (39.14%) compared to CLS (27.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTU dropped -87.23% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUTU and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer