PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTU vs. TIGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUTU vs. TIGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTU achieves a -34.96% return, which is significantly higher than TIGR's -48.74% return.


FUTU

1D
1.64%
1M
10.61%
6M
-34.30%
YTD
-34.96%
1Y
-24.61%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.09%

TIGR

1D
0.41%
1M
6.99%
6M
-42.62%
YTD
-48.74%
1Y
-47.87%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
-21.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-6.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$151.80M$142.99M$375.99M
$9.58M$8.66M$21.86M

FUTU vs. TIGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
-34.96%105.29%49.87%34.39%-6.12%-5.36%343.31%-43.61%
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Limited
-48.74%47.99%46.15%29.62%-30.55%-38.16%123.66%-56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTU and TIGR is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019

0.68

The correlation between FUTU and TIGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUTU:

$14.67B

TIGR:

$875.63M

EPS

FUTU:

HK$70.95

TIGR:

$0.62

PE Ratio

FUTU:

11.62

TIGR:

7.95

PEG Ratio

FUTU:

0.24

TIGR:

0.09

PS Ratio

FUTU:

4.86

TIGR:

1.40

PB Ratio

FUTU:

2.84

TIGR:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$24.01B

TIGR:

$645.56M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$21.07B

TIGR:

$533.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$14.81B

TIGR:

$236.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTU vs. TIGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FUTU
FUTU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FUTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TIGR
TIGR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TIGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FUTU vs. TIGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUTUTIGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.87

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.75

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

-1.22

+0.10

FUTU vs. TIGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is higher than the TIGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTU and TIGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUTU vs. TIGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTU drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, smaller than the maximum TIGR drawdown of -93.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTU and TIGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTUTIGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.23%

-93.65%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.18%

-66.44%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.18%

-66.44%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.63%

-87.28%

+8.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.34%

-86.66%

+40.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.57%

-78.09%

+30.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.27%

40.95%

-13.68%

Volatility

FUTU vs. TIGR - Volatility Comparison

Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) has a higher volatility of 14.49% compared to UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) at 10.03%. This indicates that FUTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTUTIGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.49%

10.03%

+4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.83%

45.76%

+6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.48%

61.48%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.69%

80.96%

-9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.76%

89.85%

-15.09%

Dividends

FUTU vs. TIGR - Dividend Comparison

FUTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while TIGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
2.47%0.00%2.50%
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FUTU vs. TIGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Futu Holdings Limited and UP Fintech Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FUTU vs. TIGR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Futu Holdings Limited and UP Fintech Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FUTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 5.11B and revenue of 5.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.2%.

TIGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.

FUTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 3.53B and revenue of 5.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

TIGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.

FUTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported a net income of 850.55M and revenue of 5.86B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.

TIGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FUTU and TIGR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTU has higher volatility (14.49%) compared to TIGR (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTU dropped -87.23% vs TIGR's -93.65%.

FUTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.50 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTU and TIGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer