FTXG vs. GXPS
FTXG (First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF) and GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FTXG tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index while GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GXPS.
Performance
FTXG vs. GXPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXG achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than GXPS's 7.14% return.
FTXG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 0.33%
- 3Y*
- -3.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPS
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXG vs. GXPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 5.86% | -7.11% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 7.14% | -1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXG and GXPS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXG vs. GXPS — Risk / Return Rank
FTXG
GXPS
FTXG vs. GXPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.44 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
FTXG vs. GXPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXG drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, which is greater than GXPS's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXG and GXPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.52% | -9.20% | -22.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.76% | -7.97% | -6.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -3.87% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility
FTXG vs. GXPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXG | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 13.97% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 13.97% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 13.97% | +2.66% |
FTXG vs. GXPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXG vs. GXPS - Dividend Comparison
FTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than GXPS's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 4.27% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 1.35% | 1.25% | 1.37% | 1.56% | 0.30% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXG and GXPS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXG.
FTXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.
FTXG tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXG and 0.25% for GXPS.
Find the right allocation for FTXG and GXPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer