FTPA vs. FLKR
FTPA (Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTPA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. FTPA is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTPA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
FTPA vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTPA achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 67.26% return.
FTPA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -19.17%
- 6M
- 47.28%
- YTD
- 67.26%
- 1Y
- 123.98%
- 3Y*
- 37.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FTPA vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF | 2.52% | 0.01% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 67.26% | 8.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTPA and FLKR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTPA vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
FTPA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLKR
FTPA vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTPA | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTPA vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTPA drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTPA and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTPA | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -50.06% | +47.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -25.80% | +24.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -21.94% | +21.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.86% | — |
Volatility
FTPA vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTPA | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 48.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 50.91% | -47.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 31.38% | -27.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 29.33% | -25.45% |
FTPA vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTPA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTPA vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
FTPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than FLKR's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.76% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF | 2.39% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTPA and FLKR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTPA.
FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.39% for FTPA.
FTPA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTPA and 0.09% for FLKR.
Find the right allocation for FTPA and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer