PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTPA vs. OVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTPA vs. OVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTPA achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than OVM's 3.41% return.


FTPA

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.53%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OVM

1D
-0.76%
1M
0.30%
YTD
3.41%
6M
3.58%
1Y
11.04%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
1.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTPA vs. OVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTPA and OVM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTPA vs. OVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTPA

OVM
OVM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTPA vs. OVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTPA vs. OVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTPAOVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.41

+0.72

Drawdowns

FTPA vs. OVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTPA drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum OVM drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTPA and OVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTPAOVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-15.58%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.76%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-4.01%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

Volatility

FTPA vs. OVM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTPAOVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

4.23%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.08%

5.40%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.08%

6.55%

-2.47%

FTPA vs. OVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTPA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OVM's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTPA vs. OVM - Dividend Comparison

FTPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than OVM's 6.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FTPA
Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF
2.08%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
6.14%5.45%4.91%4.66%4.21%6.10%3.97%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTPA and OVM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTPA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTPA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.14%, compared with 2.08% for FTPA.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTPA and 0.82% for OVM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTPA and OVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer