FTPA vs. EZBC
FTPA (Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTPA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. FTPA is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTPA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
FTPA vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTPA achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -31.15% return.
FTPA
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -5.09%
- 1M
- -26.01%
- YTD
- -31.15%
- 6M
- -32.61%
- 1Y
- -40.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTPA vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF | 2.33% | 0.24% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -31.15% | -17.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTPA and EZBC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTPA vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
FTPA
EZBC
FTPA vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTPA | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.22 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
FTPA vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTPA drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTPA and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTPA | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -52.07% | +49.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -52.07% | +51.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -16.13% | +15.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.78% | — |
Volatility
FTPA vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTPA | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 43.97% | -39.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.08% | 50.12% | -46.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.08% | 50.12% | -46.04% |
FTPA vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTPA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTPA vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
FTPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTPA Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF | 2.08% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTPA and EZBC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTPA.
FTPA has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
FTPA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while EZBC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTPA and 0.19% for EZBC.
Find the right allocation for FTPA and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer