FTNJ vs. LVHD
FTNJ (Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF) and LVHD (Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTNJ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while LVHD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTNJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
FTNJ vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTNJ achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 6.72% return.
FTNJ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
FTNJ vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 1.80% | 0.34% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 6.72% | 0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTNJ and LVHD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTNJ vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
FTNJ
LVHD
FTNJ vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTNJ | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.56 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
FTNJ vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTNJ drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTNJ and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTNJ | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -37.32% | +34.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -4.84% | +4.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -4.05% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility
FTNJ vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTNJ | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 9.52% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 12.87% | -9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 15.50% | -12.15% |
FTNJ vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTNJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTNJ vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
FTNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than LVHD's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 1.98% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 3.40% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTNJ and LVHD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTNJ.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.98% for FTNJ.
FTNJ is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. FTNJ tracks Actively Managed, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTNJ and 0.27% for LVHD.
Find the right allocation for FTNJ and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer