FTNJ vs. MUB
FTNJ (Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF) and MUB (iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - FTNJ tracks the Actively Managed while MUB tracks the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTNJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for MUB.
Performance
FTNJ vs. MUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTNJ achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 1.24% return.
FTNJ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
FTNJ vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 1.80% | 0.34% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 1.24% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTNJ and MUB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTNJ vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank
FTNJ
MUB
FTNJ vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTNJ | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.58 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
FTNJ vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTNJ drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, smaller than the maximum MUB drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTNJ and MUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTNJ | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -13.68% | +10.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.70% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -2.23% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.79% | — |
Volatility
FTNJ vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTNJ | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 2.92% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 4.06% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 4.92% | -1.57% |
FTNJ vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTNJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTNJ vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison
FTNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than MUB's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 1.98% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.17% | 3.14% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTNJ and MUB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTNJ.
MUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.98% for FTNJ.
FTNJ tracks Actively Managed, while MUB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTNJ and 0.07% for MUB.
Find the right allocation for FTNJ and MUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer