FTMH vs. LVHD
FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMH is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. FTMH is actively managed, while LVHD is passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
FTMH vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 10.55% return.
FTMH
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
FTMH vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 3.83% | -0.43% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 10.55% | -1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and LVHD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
FTMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LVHD
FTMH vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMH | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -37.32% | +34.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -1.43% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -4.04% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
FTMH vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 9.98% | -5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 12.91% | -8.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.02% | 15.53% | -11.51% |
FTMH vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMH vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than LVHD's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 2.70% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.29% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMH and LVHD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMH.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.70% for FTMH.
FTMH is categorized as High Yield Muni, while LVHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.27% for LVHD.
Find the right allocation for FTMH and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer