FTMH vs. LVHD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTMH (Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF) and LVHD (Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMH is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while LVHD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. FTMH is actively managed, while LVHD is passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.

Performance

FTMH vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 6.72% return.

FTMH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 3.48%
• 6M: 3.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LVHD

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 9.60%
• 3Y*: 9.33%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: 8.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMH vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF	3.48%	0.11%
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF	6.72%	-1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMH and LVHD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

FTMH vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD

LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 28
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 25
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMH vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTMH	LVHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	0.56	+0.97

Drawdowns

FTMH vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and LVHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMH	LVHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	-37.32%	+34.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.84%	+4.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-4.05%	+3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMH	LVHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00%	9.52%	-5.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.00%	12.87%	-8.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.00%	15.50%	-11.50%

FTMH vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTMH vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than LVHD's 3.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF	2.71%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF	3.40%	3.35%	4.23%	3.55%	3.30%	2.56%	3.27%	3.30%	3.82%	3.33%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTMH and LVHD in my portfolio?

FTMH and LVHD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTMH or LVHD?

On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMH or LVHD?

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMH or LVHD?

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.71% for FTMH.

What is the main difference between FTMH and LVHD?

FTMH is categorized as High Yield Muni, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMH and 0.27% for LVHD.