FTMH vs. CGHM
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM).
FTMH and CGHM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTMH is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 22, 2018. CGHM is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jun 25, 2024.
Performance
FTMH vs. CGHM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTMH vs. CGHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 0.39% | 0.11% |
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 0.35% | 0.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMH achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than CGHM's 0.35% return.
FTMH
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGHM
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTMH vs. CGHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGHM's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTMH vs. CGHM — Risk / Return Rank
FTMH
CGHM
FTMH vs. CGHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMH | CGHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.94 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMH and CGHM is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FTMH vs. CGHM - Dividend Comparison
FTMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than CGHM's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTMH Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF | 1.61% | 0.86% | 0.00% |
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 3.76% | 3.61% | 1.78% |
Drawdowns
FTMH vs. CGHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMH drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum CGHM drawdown of -5.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMH and CGHM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMH | CGHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -5.90% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -1.93% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -1.30% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility
FTMH vs. CGHM - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTMH | CGHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 4.97% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 4.65% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 4.65% | -0.77% |