FTMA vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMA is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

FTMA vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.

FTMA

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 2.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLKR

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 29.00%
• YTD: 114.41%
• 6M: 130.14%
• 1Y: 238.40%
• 3Y*: 51.14%
• 5Y*: 19.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMA vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	2.06%	0.43%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	114.41%	4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMA and FLKR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

FTMA vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMA vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTMA	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	0.55	+0.74

Drawdowns

FTMA vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMA	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-50.06%	+47.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-1.77%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-22.07%	+21.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMA	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52%	41.18%	-37.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.52%	28.19%	-24.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.52%	27.56%	-24.04%

FTMA vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTMA vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than FLKR's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.80%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	1.96%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTMA and FLKR in my portfolio?

FTMA and FLKR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTMA or FLKR?

On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMA or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMA or FLKR?

FTMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between FTMA and FLKR?

FTMA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. FTMA tracks Actively Managed, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 0.09% for FLKR.