FTMA vs. FGDL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) and FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTMA is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while FGDL is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FGDL.

Performance

FTMA vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than FGDL's -7.99% return.

FTMA

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FGDL

• 1D: -3.28%
• 1M: -11.58%
• YTD: -7.99%
• 6M: -11.39%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: 27.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTMA vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	2.45%	0.54%
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	-7.99%	7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FTMA and FGDL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

FTMA vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGDL

FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 21
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTMA vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTMA	FGDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.15	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.74	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.10	—

Drawdowns

FTMA vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, smaller than the maximum FGDL drawdown of -26.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and FGDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTMA	FGDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-26.48%	+24.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.48%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-26.48%	+26.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-4.10%	+3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTMA	FGDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38%	28.04%	-24.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.38%	19.39%	-16.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.38%	19.39%	-16.01%

FTMA vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTMA vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF	1.95%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTMA and FGDL in my portfolio?

FTMA and FGDL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTMA or FGDL?

On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTMA or FGDL?

FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTMA or FGDL?

FTMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.

What is the main difference between FTMA and FGDL?

FTMA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FGDL is Gold. FTMA tracks Actively Managed, while FGDL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 0.15% for FGDL.