FTMA vs. ZMUN
FTMA (Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - FTMA tracks the Actively Managed while ZMUN tracks the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
FTMA vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMA achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than ZMUN's 1.57% return.
FTMA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTMA vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF | 2.06% | 0.43% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.57% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMA and ZMUN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMA vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTMA | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 6.46 | -5.16 |
Drawdowns
FTMA vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMA drawdown since its inception was -2.27%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMA and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMA | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -0.09% | -2.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.02% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -0.01% | -0.50% |
Volatility
FTMA vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMA | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 0.54% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 0.54% | +2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 0.54% | +2.98% |
FTMA vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMA vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
FTMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTMA Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF | 1.96% | 0.54% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMA and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTMA.
ZMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.96% for FTMA.
FTMA tracks Actively Managed, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTMA and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for FTMA and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer